{"id":51,"date":"2018-05-18T14:42:50","date_gmt":"2018-05-18T14:42:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.kcl.ac.uk\/cancerprevention\/?p=51"},"modified":"2018-05-18T14:42:50","modified_gmt":"2018-05-18T14:42:50","slug":"the-breast-screening-scandal-part-1-why-did-it-happen","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cancerprevention.qmul.ac.uk\/index.php\/2018\/05\/18\/the-breast-screening-scandal-part-1-why-did-it-happen\/","title":{"rendered":"The breast screening scandal: Part 1 &#8211; why did it happen?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Secretary of State for Health,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.independent.co.uk\/news\/health\/jeremy-hunt-breast-cancer-screening-inquiry-nhs-women-invitations-missing-a8332446.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Jeremy Hunt, announced in the House of Commons<\/a>\u00a0that 450,00 women missed out on breast cancer screening invitations due to an IT error. He apologised wholeheartedly on behalf of the government and said: \u201ctragically, there are likely to be some people in this group who would have been alive today if the failure had not happened.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Commentators have referred to the failure as a scandal and attribute it to incompetence. The chief executive of\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.breastcancercare.org.uk\/about-us\/media\/clinical-statements\/women-failed-appalling-error-in-breast-screening-programme\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Breast Cancer Care<\/a>, Samia al Qadhi, said: \u201cHundreds of thousands of women across England have been failed by this appalling error and some have had their lives shortened as a result.\u201d Baroness Delyth Morgan,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/breastcancernow.org\/news-and-blogs\/news\/a-serious-failure-has-come-to-light-in-the-national-breast-screening-programme-in-england\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">chief executive of Breast Cancer Now,<\/a>\u00a0went further. She called it a \u201ccolossal systemic failure\u201d and said it is \u201cbeyond belief that this major mistake has been sustained for almost a decade\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Hitachi Consulting, the IT firm whose software was blamed for the error has said that its computer algorithm does exactly what they had been asked to make it do. In other words, it was either a fault in the specification of the IT system, or a fault in the way people use the system. It is much easier to blame a computer than to admit to human error.<\/p>\n<p>What is going on? How could there be such an enormous administrative error?<\/p>\n<p>Let\u2019s start with some history. When\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nhs.uk\/conditions\/breast-cancer-screening\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">breast cancer screening<\/a>\u00a0was introduced in the UK in 1988 it was offered to women aged 50-64 every three years. In the mid-1990s, it was recognised that many other countries offered screening until age 69 or older, but there was concern in the UK that older women might not attend. Three demonstration projects were carried out in women aged 65-69 and showed that attendance in this age-group was the same as for younger women.\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.thh.nhs.uk\/documents\/_Departments\/Cancer\/NHSCancerPlan.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Therefore, a decision was taken in 2000<\/a>\u00a0to extend the screening programme to include women aged 65-70. Screening up to age 70 offers two further screening invitations whereas stopping at age 69 provides only one. When breast screening invitations were finally sent to older women \u2013 most of the country only started screening large numbers of women aged 65-70 in 2005 (the extension to older women was phased in over a period of three years) \u2013 some health authorities correctly invited women aged 65-70 (inclusive) but other only invited women up to their 70<sup>th<\/sup>\u00a0birthday. An enquiry chaired by Lynda Thomas, the chief executive of Macmillan cancer support, and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/content\/364\/bmj.l552\">Professor Martin Gore<\/a> will determine what went wrong, but I would put money on the problem being a local mix-up as to whether 70-year-old women were to be included.<\/p>\n<p>Whatever the arguments about breast cancer screening, there was a government policy to offer screening to women aged 50-70, but it was not implemented properly. For that women deserve an apology.<\/p>\n<p>Want to know more about this? Read our next blog<a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.kcl.ac.uk\/cancerprevention\/2018\/05\/18\/the-breast-screening-scandal-part-2-should-women-accept-catch-up-invitations\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"> here<\/a><\/p>\n<p>For further thoughts from \u2018experts\u2019 on this story:\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.hsj.co.uk\/story.aspx?storyCode=7022316&amp;preview=1&amp;hash=DBB6D0300212A4E781CD64D53CE941AC\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/www.hsj.co.uk\/story<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Want an update on this story? Both the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nationalhealthexecutive.com\/Health-Care-News\/hunt-was-wrong-to-blame-breast-screening-scandal-on-admin-failure-panel-concludes\">National health Executive<\/a> and the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/politics\/2018\/dec\/13\/jeremy-hunt-breast-cancer-screening-statement-wrong-inquiry-finds\">Guardian<\/a> have interesting follow-ups.<\/p>\n<p>Update: Read the full inquiry report <a href=\"https:\/\/breastscreeningreview2018.independent.gov.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/CCS001_CCS1118090892-001_IBSR%202018_Accessible.pdf\">here.<\/a><\/p>\n<p><em>The views expressed are those of the author. Posting of the blog does not signify that the Cancer Prevention Group endorse those views or opinions.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/6f95fafe.sibforms.com\/serve\/MUIEAI01nZgERiZk0Nk4YIoga5q6zHmmeMBs1-LY43IDGXitKVDEvYRzX1jvvNFGJ653Kbp2ZwCWv3WB1ajwALPnYwoMOADL8HnO2alxs9H1XQ2xE6AaMfQKkRhKCvyZxQwXr56-UrZ4ucvU3pPDZ_vewd__KcBI6SmgwOgpeT1-v8yCeSY1OmSMDnld8lwHiIZIw-Gtt4ua7-Y9\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Subscribe to our mailing list to get updates of new posts&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Secretary of State for Health,\u00a0Jeremy Hunt, announced in the House of Commons\u00a0that 450,00 women missed out on breast cancer screening invitations due to an IT error. He apologised wholeheartedly on behalf of the government and said: \u201ctragically, there are likely to be some people in this group who would have been alive today if&hellip;&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/cancerprevention.qmul.ac.uk\/index.php\/2018\/05\/18\/the-breast-screening-scandal-part-1-why-did-it-happen\/\" rel=\"bookmark\">Read More &raquo;<span class=\"screen-reader-text\">The breast screening scandal: Part 1 &#8211; why did it happen?<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":17,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","cybocfi_hide_featured_image":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[68,76,112,114,115,121,219,279,281,282,311,340,411,412,414,448],"class_list":["post-51","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-breast-screening-scandal","tag-65-70","tag-age-70","tag-breast","tag-breast-cancer-care","tag-breast-cancer-now","tag-cancer","tag-extension","tag-invitation","tag-it-error","tag-jeremy-hunt","tag-mammography","tag-nhsbsp","tag-sasieni","tag-scandal","tag-screening","tag-system-failure"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cancerprevention.qmul.ac.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cancerprevention.qmul.ac.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cancerprevention.qmul.ac.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cancerprevention.qmul.ac.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cancerprevention.qmul.ac.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=51"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cancerprevention.qmul.ac.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cancerprevention.qmul.ac.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/17"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cancerprevention.qmul.ac.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=51"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cancerprevention.qmul.ac.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=51"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cancerprevention.qmul.ac.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=51"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}